RSS 2.0 Feed
RSS 2.0

Atom 1.0 Feed
Atom 1.0

  Web 2.0 Hype 


There's something about the Web 2.0 buzz that's forced itself into the fore front over the last year that's never quite sat right with me. Milan Negovan recently made a post titled “Con 2.0” which summarized my own feelings on the subject perfectly (which Milan seems to do quite often). The problem with the hype around Web 2.0 is that there seems to be a real push to solve a problem I don't have. Sure the bells and whistles are cool and have a lot of “wow-factor” to them, but I seldom come accross a new feature that carries the Web 2.0 banner that provides me with any real, or new, value. Yet somehow, VC's seem to be itching to dump in funding.

Do I really need a shiny new web toy to give me more XMLHttpRequest driven features I really don't need? Russell Beattie really hits the nail on the head when in comes to Web 2.0 IMO:

Let’s go back in history (2004) to the conception of the term “Web 2.0? itself - the shining examples then were and eBay. They didn’t just open up their back ends for developers to use via XML APIs over the web, they made A LOT OF MONEY doing it. That was the key: Every API transaction ends up with a purchase from their site. Every eBay upload ends up with a listing or a purchase or something as well. It was clear, Web 2.0 was about platforms, open APIs enabling real business, not the overhyped traffic generators of the late 90s which did nothing but waste a lot of investor’s money.

But since then Web 2.0 has just mutated. Somehow the focus flipped from “making” platforms to “using” them. Ajax came along, Social Software and Tagging took over, RSS alone was considered an API, a few companies got bought, mobile was forgotten about completely and somewhere along the way the whole part about the “business” stuff went totally out the window. Hey, I’m all about creating useful and innovative software for your users, but if you can’t make a profit, you won’t be around long enough to make any sort of difference, and will probably cause more harm than good.

It's not like anything that helped coined the term Web 2.0 is anything new. Any real techie out there knows there's no real innovation, just the same stuff used in different ways. But I don't need that. What we need is something that revolutionized the web when it comes to getting real value for businesses and consumers. Make the internet more useful and give me more reasons to never leave my house ;-). I just don't think that some fancy client-side scripting is going to do that for me. I just don't get it.

David Ing posted a funny bit of code to sum up his thoughts on the subject. Nice.


Leave a comment below.


  1. Will Asrari 3/1/2006 8:00 AM
    A quote from Death To Smoochy sums up the difference between the web of yesterday and the Web 2.0 today.

    "...With those guys it wasn't about the bells and whistles and the rickety rackety, it was all about the work...."

    Take a peek at this mockery of web 2.0. I think you'll find it quite hilarious.
  2. Ryan Farley 3/1/2006 8:05 AM


    "We promise that by the time this thing is finished, it'll have curvy edges everywhere, along with broken navigation, a confusing user interface and tags all over the shop. It's going to be awesome."

    That is quite funny. Thanks!
  3. Will 3/1/2006 9:27 AM
    Anytime. Pass it along!
  4. Will 3/1/2006 10:09 AM
    One Web 2.0'ish application that you might find interesting is Dot Net Kicks. It's similar to Digg but geared towards the .NET framework.

    It's nice to finally see a web 2.0 application that isn't too hip to use Microsoft products and technologies.
  5. saa 10/5/2006 1:33 AM
  6. Jose 5/31/2009 2:56 AM
    Yet another example of the famous "Concorde Syndrome", "Looking for wonderful solutions to solve non-existent problems".
Comments have been closed on this topic.



Also see my CRM Developer blog